Tuesday, October 31, 2006

In Blow To Conservatives, NY Post (Grudgingly) Endorses Hillary Clinton

"The Post today also endorses Hillary Rodham Clinton for re-election to the United States Senate.


Well, so are we - a little. ... Mrs. Clinton, well, she's been a pretty good senator - popular with her colleagues and as productive as a first-term legislator from the minority party probably can be."

-- New York Post editorial, Oct. 30


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Funny but the Post has lost its mind if they think Hillary Rotten has been good on national security.

10:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Funny but the Anyone has lost its mind if they think Bush/GOP has been good on national security.

Wow - writing Drivel is EASY!!!

Hmmmm Let's see:

GOP too busy worrying about where Clinton's Penis had been 1996-2000.
Bush Admin Ignored 911 warnings summer of 2001
Worst Terrorisms Attack under Bush/GOP's Watch - sat FROZEN for seven minutes WHILE NATION UNDER ATTACK.
Afghanistan - Going back to the Taliban
Iraq - Fiasco with a capital F.
Outing Covert CIA Agents who specialize is WMDs
Overstretched US Army and Marines
Wasteful DOD Spending causee by CORRUPT GOP Congressman.
Why has Osama been caught or killed?

Yep - the Bush/GOP are doing a Heckuva job on national security.

11:16 AM  
Anonymous Kagemusha said...

They knew Murdoch did a fundraiser for Hillary some time ago

I'm sure they're not scratching heads much about this.

It's that other stuff that's gnawing at them.

11:56 AM  
Anonymous bluestateguy said...

She and Murdoch have become quite buddy-buddy in recent years and I understand why. Her husband did so much to make corporate media cosolidation possible.

11:56 AM  
Anonymous Stephanie said...

The Post owned by Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is a Hillary fundraiser.

And here's why, from the editorial. They like her because she's not a progressive Democart but a hawkish centrist >

"Think of her as Sen. Pothole Redux (apologies to Alfonse D'Amato).

Meanwhile, her positions on numerous issues - particularly involving national security - have been much closer to the political center than we would have expected. "

11:57 AM  
Anonymous ProudToBeBlueInRhody said...

Meh, they go with the winner
Like the Herald backing Teddy, there's no benefit to endorsing someone who has zero chance.

11:57 AM  
Anonymous WI_DEM said...

They are likely going with the winner all the pollls indicate she is crusing towards a massive victory in the 65-70 percent range.

11:59 AM  
Anonymous Crankie Avalon said...

What else could they do? Spencer is a complete joke even a rightwing rag can get and they know Hillary isn't nearly as "left" as they get off on pretending she is.

11:59 AM  
Anonymous NYCGirl said...

Only because the Republican, John Spencer, is such a cipher. She's basically running unopposed.

11:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let her become Senator again. Maybe it will take away any aspirations of hers to become president. She is being positioned as the 2008 Democratic candidate more so by Repukes than Democrats, likely because they think she would be easy to defeat.
There are many better choices available.

6:22 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Listed on BlogShares