Wednesday, September 13, 2006

GUEST COLUMN: Are The Terrorists Winning?

It's a question that has to be answered, unfortunately.

And it pains me to say this. And it angers me to say this.

It's now been five years since Sept. 11, 2001, and each year I feel its an anniversary I seem to dislike more and more, because I see just how far our country has come since that period five years ago when it seemed like all Americans were united in spirit, despite the tragedy, and now, because I see how unfortunately divided we are, how disrespected and loathed we are by much of the rational, free-thinking world, how inept and impotent we seem in the face of danger, how fearful we have grown as a common people.

Franklin D. Roosevelt said years ago that the only thing we had to fear was fear itself, nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.

It's that second part of that sentence which strikes me more right now, because right now, all I see that we have is fear itself, and the nameless, unjustified terror we have used to paralyze ourselves from having true debates on the direction this country should be going, on whether the tactics we are using to make us safer are indeed only sowing the seeds of our downfall, of whether we are moving forward proudly and strongly, or moving backward in a reactionary, guarded and frightful manner, like rats caught in a trap.

All of this came bubbling up to the surface this morning after I read the transcript of what our President said last night on the air in what was supposedly going to be a non-political speech, but one where he once again tried to underline ways to divide Americans rather than unite Americans, which was supposed to be his big promise all those years ago before he first ascended to the Presidency, back in late 2000. But this president, who I admittedly only had hope for in the first few months after September 11, when -- after fits and starts -- he seemed to embrace a broad coalition and work towards a goal that was necessary, getting Osama bin Laden and dismantling Al-Qaeda, failed me and people who share my values once again.

It came in the line in the speech where he said: "Whatever mistakes have been made in Iraq, the worst mistake would be to think that if we pulled out, the terrorists would leave us alone. They will not leave us alone. They will follow us. The safety of America depends on the outcome of the battle in the streets of Baghdad. Osama bin Laden calls this fight "the Third World War" -- and he says that victory for the terrorists in Iraq will mean America's "defeat and disgrace forever."

This statement is nonsensical to me. It once again sets up a straw man, a false choice, that somehow, that critics of the war -- like myself -- believe that the terrorists would leave us alone if we left Iraq.

But this is not an either/or choice in the first place, which makes the thought, as voiced by the President, all the more aggravating. We know quite well that they will not leave us alone regardless of whether we're in Iraq or whether we're not in Iraq. It is besides the point.

I also find it disturbing that our President would seek to define our goals based on what one of the world's worst killers will "think of us." He and his cohorts blast those of us who seek to try to find understanding from a common citizen in the Middle East and what roots could cause a growing attraction to suicide bombing as a profession, but yet he would take the word of bin Laden as a reason to justify our actions and, furthermore, to justify his own political gain. If you reject that idea, I direct you to Dick Cheney's words, who said after Ned Lamont's victory over Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut Senatorial primary, that it "emboldens al-Qaeda types." So voting in Iraq by dipping your finger and making it nice and purple symbolizes freedom; the same action in America emboldens the terrorists.

But back to the subject of this screed, that the terrorists are winning. Indeed, if anything has happened in the last five years, we've played into al Qaeda's hands more than anything else. To wit:

-- We have validated the belief of those who suggest we are intentionally looking to attack and occupy Muslim lands through our disastrous occupation of Iraq. I hold no love for Saddam Hussein, but what we have accomplished there is nothing short of a disaster, one that has only emboldened the terrorists and given cover to those who would seek to boost bin Laden's standing in the world. Is there any wonder so many in the Muslim world feel disdain and hatred when they think of the United States? Can we honestly say we have not given them cause for this feeling? Some would suggest that the invasion of Afghanistan did the same thing, but that doesn't hold up -- the entire world felt that invasion was justified, and many still do today, including JABBS.

-- We have turned our existences into fearful ones, running about wildly at every color-bar-enhanced generation of a terror warning. Bill Schneider recently reported on CNN that "One year after 9/11, 31 percent of Americans said they felt fear when they thought about the attacks. Five years after the attacks, that numbers is up to 44 percent." More people are living in fear now, five years later? Is Osama bin Laden not laughing at this?

-- America is more divided than ever. There have always been groups of people on either side of the political spectrum who want to reflexively blame other Americans or the government for their ills or for the world's ills; sometimes they are right, and sometimes they are misguided and hysterical. But as tough as this administration likes to talk about what it is doing, their tactics -- conflating those who oppose them as "appeasers," suggesting that those who disagree, in the worlds of Secretary of State Condi Rice, would have decided to maintain the status quo with regard to slavery (SLAVERY!? Are you serious?), suggest that they perceive their greatest enemies to be those in their own country, not the terrorists. It suggests that they regard people who disagree with them as more dangerous and as a larger threat than the terrorists themselves.

-- Conflating our various enemies into one gigantic hydra-headed beast, for which the only response is to kill, kill, kill and kill some more. Much like Saddam, I hold no love or respect for Hamas, Hezbollah, the governments of Iran and Syria, or Al-Qaeda. But to suggest they're all on the same side and all have the same goals not only ignores history but also results in poor planning and poor strategy that, if the same method is applied to dealing with them, results in the possibility of them uniting in common cause against us, rather than those groups being isolated from each other. Dividing and conquering is the true way to win the struggle against these various groups, not by united them while at the same time estranging ourselves from our own allies and our own friends; the reputation of the United States, once considered a beacon, is now in the toilet around the world. Surely this didn't happen just "because," but for good reasons, those of our own doing.

And I'm convinced that most of this has happened because the President and his cronies are fearful, reactionary, unintelligent men, but mostly fearful. It's the reason they allowed or turned the other way when terrorist suspects were herded into secret prisons around the world to be tortured, and why the Administration seeks to wiretap Americans without warrants for an indefinite period of time, when a court exists that would allow them to already lawfully conduct surveillance without a warrant for a few days to begin with. They can already do what they want -- and yet, they felt the need to subvert that even further.

The President now wants to be able to try some of the dangerous terrorists that we managed to capture in military tribunals without allowing them to see the evidence against them -- are we really so fearful to think that we won't have enough of a case against these people that we're simply going to execute them when the evidence isn't shown to them? Is this the United States? Or is this Pinochet's Chile? To embrace torture, gulags and secret prisons and kangaroo courts, is not to embrace the values we were taught as Americans. It is the antithesis of it, to be honest. If we cannot be confident that we cannot prevail in a trial where the defendants are terrorists, then we have already lost.

I hesitate to bring up Nazis, but since the Administration has done it so many times, well, I feel I can do the same. But the fact is, we held trials at Nuremberg for some of the worst criminals the world has ever seen, and they were open proceedings, where the defendants were allowed to view the evidence against them. The same can be done for these criminals as well. And criminals is what they are.

Much as the administration likes to pump these people up into some kind of gigantic beast coming to enslave us, they are really just common thugs, albeit with greater delusions of grandeur and larger intentions than your garden-variety mobster. But by inflating them into something more than that, Bush glorifies their own ideology and makes it, to many in the Middle East, seem a potential alternative -- instead of marginalizing them as the thugs and dirtbags they are, fearful men that they are themselves, who seek only power for their own purposes, who seek not free and open societies, but thugocracies where they are the only law and nobody is allowed to speak freely.

It is a measure of pride to me that Muslim communities in America -- and other types of communities in America too -- share very little with those people, because it shows how free speech, the rule of law and economic opportunity present much better alternatives than any of Bin Laden's hateful ideology, and the dead-end attitude he represents towards openness, democracy and freedom of speech. Osama bin Laden represents none of those things.

President Bush, unfortunately, does not speak to the best in America, and does not inspire America to greater things but speaks only to our fear and our worry. He talks constantly of the great sacrifices that people made at Ground Zero, and those who gave charitably in the wake of Hurricane Katrina but does nothing to inspire that among all citizens, instead only preying on our fears to justify short-term political gains.

Karl Rove is going to do the same again, by using 9/11 families to justify the usage of these kangaroo courts that are so far from our own values, that do not represent America. Some will ask me whether I believe the terrorists "have rights" or some such; I really don't care about them either way. They've mortgaged their claim on humanity a long time ago. Ultimately the terrorists we have captured will be tried, and either given life in prison or death, depending on the level of their involvement. I am fine with either of those outcomes -- this is the justice they will be faced with.

But I do care about America and what it represents, however, and this is not what it represents. Not when, five years after 9/11, I walk by a hole in the ground every day, as Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans put it harshly -- even though he's right. Not when, one year after New Orleans drowned, federal, state and local officials dicker about putting things back in place and cronyism results in favorable contracts to those who give most to the government, and money is stolen while federal officials do nothing about it.

President Bush, to me, represents a degradation of the institution of the Presidency. There are many liberals who retain much anger at Ronald Reagan, and while the man was no saint, he at least showed the pragmatism to work with those he disagreed with and the strength to consider viewpoints that didn't conform to an already-decided-upon worldview. Negotiating with, and having discussions with, and talking to people who disagree with you and in fact may be a sworn enemy is not a sign of weakness, but a sign of strength. It's what many people of an older generation would call "being a man," (excuse the sexism).

Moving on, Bill Clinton may have brought a measure of shame on the office due to his personal peccadillos, but at no time did he tarnish the legacy of the office in terms of his conduct in foreign or domestic policy -- even though, he, too, was not perfect. And as ineffectual a president as I thought George Herbert Walker Bush was, I now see that his quiet strength and practical approach is far superior to the destructive, radical, frightened worldview that his son holds.

Supporters of George W. Bush frequently try to evoke parallels to Reagan, but he is nothing of the kind, and his failure to learn the positive lessons of that man's successors -- Bush and Clinton -- instead desiring mostly to rebuke their legacies at every turn, underscores his unwillingness to learn and understand that he was not born in a vacuum, where he can "make his own reality."

I do wish now that a statesman (or woman) existed, one who could rally people in the manner of JFK, Eisenhower, Truman or FDR. Maybe I'm naïve, and my elders who remember those days will tell me that they weren't all that great, or something like that. But I won't lose hope, even as the president squanders almost all of the unity that existed after 9/11. I will remember, as Edward R. Murrow said, that "we are not descended from fearful men, not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate, and to defend causes that were for the moment unpopular.”

17 Comments:

Blogger thewaronterrible said...

Excellent post.
A fine accounting of the true progressive position that can be thrown at Republican blohards and their MSM enablers whenever they attempt to interpret our position for us in a few BS soundbites.

6:45 PM  
Anonymous leftofthedial said...

they won the minute the Patriot Act passed

10:12 PM  
Anonymous woodsprite said...

They are as long as the Repubs stay in power.

10:13 PM  
Anonymous orpupilofnature57 said...

First ,Shrub won ,fear won ,Fascism won ,The good old boy network is winning.

10:13 PM  
Anonymous Ezlivin said...

They've won and already sent their team home

They don't need to ever launch another terrorist attack on the US again. The damage has already been done.

This is not the USA in which I grew up. Our carefree nature and many of our civil liberties are gone. They won't return without an extremely difficult struggle.

10:14 PM  
Anonymous liberal N proud said...

The terrorist are winning

Why: because we allow the government to keep us in fear constantly. Fear is the no 1 tactic used by the terrorist.

bu$h and his regime are helping the terrorist win!

10:14 PM  
Anonymous ComerPerro said...

Clearly, they aren't.

They only got off one attack. Although, since they shouldn't have even been able to get that attack off, 9/11 could be described as a win. But, given the desire for a Peral Harbor style attack by BushCo, I'd describe the success of the 9/11 attacks as more of a "gimme".

Sure, they are recruiting and are probably having an easy time with it thanks to Bush's wars, but I don't think they will ever be able to hit us here in the US.

And I don't even think they are focused enough to set into motion a radical Islamic government in Iraq. Right now, its just mayhem. Granted, that's all terrorists seem to want (if you buy into RW thinking), but I don't think they will ever fully set the agenda they claim to be working towards.



I think its actually a very Republican tactic to suggest that the terrorists are winning. They want people to feel at risk, so that they won't take time to stop and think rationally.


I contend that the "terrorists" are not winning.

But Bush's lax stance on anti-terrorism measures and his failure to start up any global, coopoerative anti-terror efforts doesn't hurt...

10:15 PM  
Anonymous 4MoronicYears said...

Next go around it will prolly be 19 Iraqis who make a move, now wouldn't that just frost you??

10:15 PM  
Anonymous KharmaTrain said...

Thoughts of September, 2000...

While the "pundits" say 9/11/01 changed everything, I suggest that it was 12/2/2000...the day the Supreme Court over-stepped their authority and took the election away from Al Gore.

Looking back 6 years almost seems surreal. Gas was still $1.25 a gallon, the market was expected to top 11,000, the NASDAQ was still near the 5,000 mark and people were more concerned about moving up to their next job than finding one to replace their current one. One could travel the world and not be ashamed to be an American or turn on a Presidential news conference and not shudder in both embarassment and disgust. Seems like a different lifetime on a different planet.

Let's say that the terrorist won on 12/2/2000...and haven't let up since. And these terrorists don't live in caves...right now they're squatting on property you and I pay for in Washington.

10:15 PM  
Anonymous rubberducky said...

How much better it would have been to send a massive amount of troops to Afghanistan ,crushed the taliban, and came home victorious!!!!!

10:16 PM  
Anonymous notsodumbhillbilly said...

Yes and no
The PNAC cabal succeeded in terrorizing this nation for several years, but people seem to be wising up to their tactics now.

10:16 PM  
Anonymous Prisoner_Number_Six said...

Yes. the George W. *bush cabal IS winning.

10:16 PM  
Anonymous CarlVK said...

As long as Republicans prevail, yes.

10:17 PM  
Anonymous Mike03 said...

If you have time, read Tom Rick's book "Fiasco"

This is the best book I have ever read on the Iraq war, and aftewards, I was totally convinced there is no possibility in the world that the US will ever "win" this war. We are throwing good money after bad, destroying lives, blowing up precious men and women in our military, destroying our reputation everywhere on the planet--for nothing. When all is said and done, a trillion dollars will have been wasted.

10:17 PM  
Anonymous mmonk said...

They won. We are on the cusp of never being free again if we don't turn things around in this country. So in a backwards kind of way, they have. Have they won from their standpoint? No, because they haven't brought down the US economy yet which I believe was a goal of theirs (to bring down the military industrial complex) as evidenced by their targets and rhetoric.

10:29 PM  
Anonymous unkachuck said...

winning what?....

....the only ones winning are the oil companies and the defense contractors....

....I find it absolutely amazing that the country that helped defeat the fascists during WWII, that drove the Soviet Union out of existance, that put a man on the moon, that invented modern electronics and technology is somehow terrorized and confounded by bearded old men in caves....

....we have either been intentionally freightened by the 'boogie-man' or bearded old men in caves have developed super-human powers....

12:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The terrorists are winning.
It is discouraging to see recent Bush approval numbers creeping up into the 40s from the 30s (NBC/WSJ and ABC and CNN) presumably as a result of Bush series of 9-11/Iraq fear/propaganda speeches over the past few weeks.
This shows people are being duped by the "nothing but fear" B.S. -- even after the latest Senate report solidly debunked Bushie long-claimed Saddam-Al Quaeda connections.
The increasing acceptance of the Bush fear campaign does not bode well for the one ray of hope of the Democrats taking over at least one house of congress in November to bring back a two-party government and some bipartisan debate.

1:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Listed on BlogShares