Wednesday, September 07, 2005

Was Bush Slow To Respond to Katrina? Conservatives Say No. History Says Otherwise

Was President Bush slow to react to Hurricane Katrina?

Conservative say no. But look past their endless criticisms of the Democratic governor and the Democratic mayor (who they forget was a Bush supporter in 2000). That's just empty spin.

Let's look at some actual facts.

The Daily Howler took a look at Bush's timeline reacting to Katrina, and compared it with recent reactions from Bush, Clinton and George H.W. Bush.

Since it's clear that Katrina is the worst hurricane in recent memory -- in terms of physical damage and loss of life -- one would assume that it would require the prompest reaction from the president. But that hasn't been the case -- and that's why there's been bipartisan disappointment. Conservatives, when they are done criticizing the Democrats of Louisiana for their failures, turn around and suggest it's only "hate Bush" liberals angry with Bush. But that's not the case.


So how have recent presidents reacted to massive natural disasters?

On Monday, when the hurricane hit, President Bush flew to Arizona and California to discuss Medicare. On Tuesday, the day the levee broke, Bush flew to San Diego to speak to World War II veterans. On Wednesday, he flew over New Orleans on way to a speech at the Rose Garden. On Thursday he made comments on ABC's Good Morning America. On Friday, as the federal response reached the Gulf Coast, so did Bush.

So, if you're scoring at home, that's four days from impact to the point when the "cavalry" arrived -- cowboy president included.

Now, let's go into the wayback machine and look at what other presidents did -- most often, with storms that were not as destructive as Katrina.

Hurricane Andrew (1992): A Category 5 hurricane, “Hurricane Andrew slammed into Southern Florida 13 years ago this week, leaving behind more than $30 million in damage, 100,000 people homeless, and more than a dozen dead," said NBC's Stone Phillips, in a report aired in 2002.

So, how quickly did the federal government, under George H.W. Bush, react?

From the NBC report: "Perhaps most surprisingly, in the first three days after Andrew, there was little outside help coming into South Florida, no federal cavalry riding over the hill. Local governments and charities were scrambling to do what they could. ... But on Day 4, August 28th, outside help finally arrived: federal troops. Twenty thousand National Guard, Army and Marine Corps troops poured into South Florida. They restored order, set up field kitchens to feed the hungry, built tent cities to house the homeless, and helicoptered supplies to victims in remote areas."

So the federal government under George H.W. Bush reacted much the same as the federal government under George W. Bush -- ironically both dealing with Category 5 hurricanes.


Now, compare that with the federal response to lesser hurricanes, under President Clinton's watch:

Hurricane Bertha (1996): A Category 2 hurricane nowhere near the scale of Katrina. But how did President Clinton respond?

-- An estimated 500,000 people were ordered to evacuate six north Florida counties. About 50,000 were asked to get off Hatteras and Ocracoke islands on North Carolina's Outer Banks. And officials urged the evacuation of parts of two South Carolina counties with 380,000 residents.
—Clinton canceled appearances in Orlando and Tampa.

Hurricane Floyd (1999): In anticipation of the hurricane striking the Southeast, Clinton cut short a trip to New Zealand, where he was attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit, and skipped a one-day rest in Hawaii, to arrive back in Washington within 24 hours of when Floyd hit.

Originally a Category 4 hurricane, by the time Floyd reached North Carolina, it had been reduced to Category 2. But as with Katrina, it flooded major highways, creating logistical nightmares for emergency personnel. People ignored evacuation orders and were left stranded on rooftops.

Clinton arrived on Monday, Sept. 19, four days after Floyd damaged North Carolina and Virginia. But no one complained, because, as CNN reported: "The Federal Emergency Management Agency, criticized for incompetence during the Reagan and Bush administrations, has been more recently hailed as a success story."


In other words, dealing with lesser hurricanes, Clinton acted more swiftly, apparently with better planning and a stronger response from FEMA.

Of course, the hurricanes are not comparable. And sadly, neither are the federal responses. Conservatives want to spin President Bush's response time -- but a simple recitation of the facts speaks volumes.


Anonymous emperor72 said...

Good post. Thanks!

1:41 AM  
Anonymous ticklebug said...

This was very interesting.

1:53 AM  
Anonymous darktirade said...

It just shows
which presidents actually cared about their constituents. Clinton may not have been a great guy in his personal life, but at least he did the job he was hired to do, and he worked for the american people. And that's what matters to the american people.

2:22 AM  
Blogger Damned Dissenter said...

Democrats, you just don't get it. The most important thing is not that a president "cares" or "works for people" or even that he "do the job" he was hired for. The most important thing is that he do the bidding of gay-hating, fetus-huggers like Pat Robertson and James Dobson. Also that he bend over for his corporate cronies whenever they decide to feed at the taxpayers' trough.

This guy is wholly bought and owned by religious fanatics and corporate bandits. But where is the news in that? The phrase "no shit!" comes to mind. Is anyone seriously surprised that he is incompetent? Or that he's too busy to help drowning poor people? No shit.

But you voted for him -- TWICE! You deserve him. Congratulations red states.

4:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't blame the puppet. Rove is in charge here, and the "most important thing" is to use desperately needed resources, like firefighters, as campaign props.

"The crew's first assignment: to stand beside President Bush as he tours devastated areas." From the The Salt Lake Tribune

5:18 AM  
Anonymous rob of wilmington, del. said...

What's sad is how quickly the right is spinning this. Scarborough last night (who otherwise provided thoughtful coverage) ranted about the hot water Mayor Nagin was in. Conveniently, Nagin is a Democrat (although he was a Bush supporter in 2000).

But Scarborough only made passing mention to any criticism Bush had received.

Remember, party over country!!!

11:48 AM  
Blogger Damned Dissenter said...

I give up. There is officially no hope for America now. Rob, you are right: it is party, first and last.

Bush could be on video eating babies and they would spin it to be the babies' fault. And then Republicans would believe it!!!!!

Gallop sez: only 13% of all Americans said that Bush was "most responsible" for the problems in New Orleans after the hurricane. By a margin of 69% to 10%, Republicans give Bush a positive rather than negative rating for his response.

Un-be-freakin-lievable. What is the point?

12:30 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Listed on BlogShares