Friday, May 20, 2005

Stretching the Truth on Newsweek: McClellan Gets it Wrong (Part 1)

What was White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan thinking?

You no doubt are well aware of Newsweek's one bad source story, which said that an American interrogator at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, had flushed a copy of the Koran down a toilet. Newsweek offered a formal retraction of the May 1 story on May 16, although Newsweek editor Mark Whitaker told the Washington Post that the magazine is "still trying to ascertain" whether the Koran incident took place. Last year, four former British detainees charged in a lawsuit that Guantanamo guards threw prisoners' Korans into a toilet.

Newsweek's major mistake was to allege that the U.S. Southern Command had confirmed that an interrogator defiled the sacred Muslim text. The magazine's anonymous source -- incorrectly identified as "sources" -- later backtracked from the claim.

But while everyone admits that this was a case of sloppy journalism, take a look at what McClellan said May 17:

MCCLELLAN: The facts are very clear. This report was used in the region by people opposed to the United States to incite violence.

But are the facts that clear?

Here's what Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on May 12:

MYERS: It's the -- it's a judgment of our commander in Afghanistan, General Eikenberry, that in fact the violence that we saw in Jalalabad was not necessarily the result of the allegations about disrespect for the Koran -- and I'll get to that in just a minute -- but more tied up in the political process and the reconciliation process that President Karzai and his Cabinet is conducting in Afghanistan. So that's -- that was his judgment today in an after- action of that violence. He didn't -- he thought it was not at all tied to the article in the magazine.


MSNBC's Keith Olbermann, in his on-line blog, called for McClellan's resignation.

"Newsweek’s version of this story has varied from the others over the last two years -- ones in The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Washington Post, and British and Russian news organizations --only in that it quoted a government source who now says he didn’t have firsthand knowledge of whether or not the investigation took place (oops, sorry, shoulda mentioned that, buh-bye)," he wrote.

Olbermann, referencing Congressional Quarterly columnist Craig Crawford, suggested: "The news organization (Newsweek) turns to the administration for a denial. The administration says nothing. The news organization runs the story. The administration jumps on the necks of the news organization with both feet -- or has its proxies do it for them. ... Ultimately, though, the administration may have effected its biggest mistake over this saga, in making the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs look like a liar or naïf, just to draw a little blood out of Newsweek’s hide."


And, just to prove this isn't a "liberal vs. conservative" issue, consider what conservative columnist David Brooks wrote in the May 19 edition of the New York Times.

"I click my mouse over to the transcripts of administration statements and I can't believe what I'm seeing," Brooks wrote. "We're in the middle of an ideological war against people who want to destroy us, and what have the most powerful people on earth become? Whining media bashers. They're attacking Newsweek while bending over backward to show sensitivity to the Afghans who just went on a murderous rampage."

I couldn't have said it better myself.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent observation. The problem is the reaction to the Newsweek story of the Koran being flushed down the toilet was not reported that way. Gen. Richard Myers discrediting claims that the incident sparked the violence did not make it in any of the mainstream newsstories I saw. What I did see and read was a lot of Bush propaganda of Muslims in an uproar over the Newsweek story.
Maybe if the Myers' account had duely received more attention, than these right wing commentators overwhelming the media over the last few days, these "wild-eyed" lunatics would not have have been so conveniently able to call for a public lynching of Newsweek's editors.
The whole commotion anyway covers up a much larger issue: why the Bush administration is not being held accountable for misrepresentations to drag the country into the Iraq war.
I noticed 79 Democrats in congress this week calling for the investigation into the Downing Street memo received scant coverage.
For all you people who do not think this issue merits attention I have five words: Watergate, Whitewater and Monica Lewinski.

12:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i agree that the downing street should be receiving more press. i also agree bush has to answer for some of his administrations actions. but the newsweek story covers up that issue---c'mon. i think michael jackson, scott petersen, the filibuster, and everything else also covers up that story. what passes as news these days is hysterical.

i would suggest that the biggest issue these days is the pathetic state of the news. i can barely every find centrist, realistic news anywhere. everything is spun completely one way or another.

newsweek made a mistake; another one was made today with pictures of saddam all over the place. it has apologized and nothing more can be done. whether or not the mistake caused violence.....i dont even care. it happened. it doesnt excuse the actions of the nutjobs we are up against. if every time someone talked negatively about jews, israelis killed someone where would we be.

the actions of the muslims (or anyone for that matter) who commit violence in the name of religion puts shame on all people, period.

2:24 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Listed on BlogShares